vintage ads

I married a fluffy
and other choice items from an early 1970's Aust Women's Weekly at Vintage Ads journal.

(via the ultimate insult)

---

Comments: vintage ads

Where, and via whom?
Posted by Scott Wickstein at April 18, 2005 05:10 PM

...What, and which?

I thought your cryptic question might relate to the Ad, Scott, but try as I might, I just can't read the first line of text. I enlarged it x 150 but not sharp enough to spot any clues in the rice...

(I did see that Ham and Pineapple are a sizzling combo, anway.)
Posted by boynton at April 18, 2005 05:57 PM

Your blog is rapidly becoming an invaluable pointer to source material. Magic stuff.
Posted by flute at April 18, 2005 09:16 PM

He reminded me of Jeff Kennett.

(I remember that Gummo had a good Fluffy joke)
Posted by cs at April 19, 2005 02:25 AM

but he's so....smooov

Maybe it's the chest that's fluffy. Men's chests usually were, in the 1970s
Posted by laura at April 19, 2005 10:50 AM

You want fluffy?

http://kev.needham.ca/gallery/misccrap/OneEasyPiece_001

You got fluffy, babe.

(Apparently Holden FX's got one in jesuitical black)
Posted by Nabakov at April 19, 2005 03:06 PM

Must get one in camel.
Posted by cs at April 19, 2005 05:10 PM

Must get one in camel? Why? Am thinking would look nicer on you than inserted in domesticated ruminant.
Posted by Nabakov at April 19, 2005 05:31 PM

Hmm...I was going to say "one hump or two?" myself...

("Because one is enough when it's you.")

But yep- the Big Zip in 50% Polyester is It.
Posted by boynton at April 19, 2005 05:42 PM

rude people
Posted by cs at April 20, 2005 12:45 AM

Scott - I just saw "boynton" on a laptop XP IE, and see what you mean. Or "don't see" what you mean.
For some reason the link
http://www.livejournal.com/community/vintage_ads/66985.html#cutid1
and the via
http://www.ultimateinsult.net/archives/2005/04/13/vintage-ads/trackback/
have gone missing.

Curious...
Posted by boynton at April 21, 2005 11:47 PM