I married a fluffy
and other choice items from an early 1970's Aust Women's Weekly at Vintage Ads journal.
(via the ultimate insult)
Comments: vintage ads
Where, and via whom?
Posted by Scott Wickstein at April 18, 2005 05:10 PM
...What, and which?
I thought your cryptic question might relate to the Ad, Scott, but try as I might, I just can't read the first line of text. I enlarged it x 150 but not sharp enough to spot any clues in the rice...
(I did see that Ham and Pineapple are a sizzling combo, anway.)
Posted by boynton at April 18, 2005 05:57 PM
Your blog is rapidly becoming an invaluable pointer to source material. Magic stuff.
Posted by flute at April 18, 2005 09:16 PM
He reminded me of Jeff Kennett.
(I remember that Gummo had a good Fluffy joke)
Posted by cs at April 19, 2005 02:25 AM
but he's so....smooov
Maybe it's the chest that's fluffy. Men's chests usually were, in the 1970s
Posted by laura at April 19, 2005 10:50 AM
You want fluffy?
You got fluffy, babe.
(Apparently Holden FX's got one in jesuitical black)
Posted by Nabakov at April 19, 2005 03:06 PM
Must get one in camel.
Posted by cs at April 19, 2005 05:10 PM
Must get one in camel? Why? Am thinking would look nicer on you than inserted in domesticated ruminant.
Posted by Nabakov at April 19, 2005 05:31 PM
Hmm...I was going to say "one hump or two?" myself...
("Because one is enough when it's you.")
But yep- the Big Zip in 50% Polyester is It.
Posted by boynton at April 19, 2005 05:42 PM
Posted by cs at April 20, 2005 12:45 AM
Scott - I just saw "boynton" on a laptop XP IE, and see what you mean. Or "don't see" what you mean.
For some reason the link
and the via
have gone missing.
Posted by boynton at April 21, 2005 11:47 PM