"Dick Jones" to pick the most adjacent exemplar, while a "he" is not for purposes of counting a "he". Your formality has possibly made the little machine proceed inexactly toward a skewed and misleading computational assessment.
The formal lack of boyntonian specificity may, may, account. It may be that that's what's what. Less she than he-less. There's an Aussie pun there waiting for an autocthonic push, ya. The rest was mere conjecture. Mine own was a potentially poofteristic pink by a grand margin. The first day. Today it's gone blue more. Without any further ado of pronomial thirds. Plus it doesn't tabulate the imagery now does it?
10 comments:
Kewwl. I will go have a look at mine later on.
Blimey - 56% blue, 44% pink. Literature is definitely still dominated par les hommes.
I only hang around here for the chicks. Can I have one to take away please?
Genevieve: 50/50 at Sarsparilla.
59%/ 41% at LP...
pk: Check
Aw. I was hoping for a generic.
"Dick Jones" to pick the most adjacent exemplar, while a "he" is not for purposes of counting a "he". Your formality has possibly made the little machine proceed inexactly toward a skewed and misleading computational assessment.
73% blokey, with a token 27% sheila stuff.
My formality is she?
Formal-ity vs formal ties?
Would a formal tugboat be less blokey?
The formal lack of boyntonian specificity may, may, account.
It may be that that's what's what.
Less she than he-less.
There's an Aussie pun there waiting for an autocthonic push, ya.
The rest was mere conjecture.
Mine own was a potentially poofteristic pink by a grand margin. The first day.
Today it's gone blue more. Without any further ado of pronomial thirds.
Plus it doesn't tabulate the imagery now does it?
True, too few do (tabulate imagery)
Post a Comment